Norbert Gombos vs Marko Topo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Topo has a slightly lower success rate on second serve points, winning 44.62% compared to Gombos' 46.97%. Does this indicate an advantage for Gombos on serve? It might.
• Return Game Analysis: While Topo has won 43.66% of opponents' second serve points, Gombos has a stronger performance with 48.1%. On first serve returns, Topo wins 25.75% compared to 26.48% for Gombos, giving Gombos a slight edge overall in returns.
• Under Pressure: Topo excels under pressure, saving 61.54% of breakpoints, which surpasses Gombos' 51.21%. Could this resilience be a deciding factor? Possibly.
• Performance Overview: Topo has a higher match win rate over the past year, winning 64.86% of matches, while Gombos won 61.43%.
• Surface Preferences: Topo favors hard courts with a 66% win rate, whereas Gombos excels on clay with a 59% win rate.
• Competitive Level: Both players have similar success at Challenger/ITF tournaments above $10K, with marginal differences in win percentages.
• Direct Head-to-Head: Topo leads their face-to-face encounters with a 1-0 record, having won 2 of 3 sets played.
• Opponent Quality: Gombos' average opponent ranking is slightly higher at 378.79, compared to Topo's 427.
• Head-to-Head Deciding Set Wins: Topo has won the only deciding set they've played against each other.
• Break Point Conversion: Gombos is more efficient at break points, converting 38.42% of opportunities, as opposed to Topo's 30.14%.

Editorial Prediction (June 10, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the upcoming match between Marko Topo and Norbert Gombos, several factors come into play. Topo demonstrates resilience under pressure with superior breakpoint saving ability, an asset that can prove crucial in tight situations.

Gombos, however, shows strengths in return games and break point conversion, potentially giving him an edge if the match features many break opportunities. His slight advantage in second serve points and historical success on clay, contrasting with Topo's preference for hard surfaces, could influence the competition dynamics.

The head-to-head history is limited but favors Topo, who holds a 1-0 record against Gombos with better performance in their previous deciding set. Hence, factoring these aspects, Topo may hold a thin psychological advantage.

Considering all these elements, while both players are closely matched, Gombos' efficiency in several areas may slightly tilt the scale in his favor. Thus, Gombos is predicted to have a slightly higher likelihood of winning this match.